Abdullah Saeed Al-Mobty
Executive Vice President
Levin Dmitry Alexandrovich
Chief Product Manager
Rated on 2018-05-21
Team: Lots of red flags ...... some team members have very poor LinkedIn profile ... and some don't have any LinkedIn .... Vision: I have been added twice in silkchain grp without permission and I leave 2 times. Soft cap is huge .... without proper marketing it would be hard to raise this amount ..... Don't find any MVP ...... Update rating They have mvp they send me the mvp link
Rated on 2018-07-20
Well written WP, an ambitious project with a great vision. The project has a lot of interesting features. Removing or lessening the hurdles and obstacles to cross-border trading is always desireable; I am a strong advocate of a globalised and transparent international system for trade. If all goes well, SilkChain might be the gamechanger that the industry has been waiting for. I wish the team a great success and good luck!
Rated on 2018-06-02
Very ambitious project, but is difficult to implement. 55 000 eth soft cap? I am not sure it will be achieved. In the second quarter of 2019, the stated cooperation with the Bank of Bahrain. See no confirmation this. Marketing and advertising project is not very global, so I doubt in achieving software cap. Community 10 million people? Do not see the proof of this. Stated 100 team members, but on the icobench see other number of people. This is the tenth project, which States that he blockchain 3.0. 20% of tokens for the founders and team ?? You seriously? Only 25% of tokens for sale, high risk for investment. Not found mvp Update: Mvp is ready, issues was fixed
Rated on 2018-05-27
UPD. Was: I saw a good, big team at first glance, but when I went to check their profiles, many didn't mention the project at all or the accounts were created just recently. Many have too few people and questions regarding working experience. I also did not see the MVP (minimal viable product). And the Soft Cap is too big, and this is a risk for investors. Do you really need $55 million for the minimum functioning of the project? I don't really believe in it. Opinions I have so far are contradictory. Now MVP is ready, KYC passed, Soft cap changed. Good job guys! Good luck!
Rated on 2018-08-16
With such an ambitious project and a high hardcap, this team is too thin and lack a lot of positions especially for this big project. If I wan an investor, I would not go with this project frankly. Let's have a look at team members and advisors, you don't know their role, writing them as member is too general. This is the pitch for marketing and sale. Hope the team will improve this.
Rated on 2018-09-04
The team seems to be excellent at first sight, but it is unclear what role it actually plays. Soft cap is too huge. I can not measure the possibility of realization. Moreover, I think that it is necessary to review the financial plan to see why such a huge amount of money is needed like this.
Rated on 2018-09-24
Good team with a great history of work and leading big projects. Solid activity on github - I loved it! Huge social media presence, decent medium articles and massive telegram community. Amazing whitepaper with all level of detailed expected by investors. This project can be huge if executed right way!
Rated on 2018-10-09
Interesting concept and I can see how it can help to improve supply chain businesses and also other segments of the ecosystem. Team is strong as well.
Rated on 2018-10-12
This is a project with a massive scale and I doubt if the current team will be able to pull it off successfully. On top of that, the team members don't have any roles; they are just "members" and it's a little concerning. Disclaimer: This is my independent review on this ICO and does not constitute any investment advice. ICOs are risky, kindly do your own research before investing.
Rated on 2018-10-13
This is a massive undertaking. Very few details are provided as to the specifics of how they will execute. There is Zero breakdown of how the funds will be allocated. I enjoyed reading the whitepaper and learning about the history of the Silk Road, but there are many gaps here. This is not financial advice or a recommendation to invest in this or any other ICO. Investors must perform their own due diligence and not rely on external ratings to make their final investment decisions. ICOs are risky and 100% loss of capital is possible.
Rated on 2018-10-21
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.
Silkchain whitepaper issued for Ethereums ERC-20 protocol based token offering.
Launch of SilkChain 1.0 Testnet, supporting sBFT consensus, reaching 500 tps. Launch of cross-chain unified API TurboSDK, supporting Ethereum and SilkChain 1.0 Testnet. Launch of WYSIWYG BPMN editor TurboBPMN, supporting Ethereum and SilkChain 1.0 Testnet. DApps based on Ethereum available for testing.
Launch of cross-chain digital assets transfer protocol DATP.
Launch of SilkChain 1.0 Mainnet, supporting multi smart contract tiers, integration of CryptoApps, more pluggable consensus mechanisms, reaching 2000 tps. Launch of CryptoApps specifications and CryptoApps store. Launch of SilkCredit based on SilkChain 1.0.
TurboSDK and TurboBPMN supporting for EOS, SilkChain 2.0 preview. Launch of SilkFinance, SilkExchange.
Launch of SilkContract, SilkSupply, SilkB2B.
Launch of SilkChain 2.0, reaching 10000 tps. Launch of BaaS platform. Launch of other DApps developed by community partners.